Maybe Most of the Time
Improvements are sometimes (perhaps most of the time) problematic.
Often someone has, or at other times others/many others have, a vested interest in the status quo. And thus they resist.
I have seen clients and other stakeholder resist new Processes (redesigned old processes) and the new Learning Content meant to help enable the new processes.
But mostly it’s the Learners/Performers that resist.
And often it’s those considered to be the Master Performers – my term where you might use Exemplar, Star Performers, etc., etc.
Why Would Master Performers Resist?
I often think it’s because they are insecure, not sure, that they can successfully master the New Way.
So they say – aloud at times – but mostly to themselves or to others in low, hushed tones – No Way.
But On Occasion the New Way Is Stupid
I have seen that too.
And Master Performers can see that more readily than I, a hired gun so-to-speak – for the Performance Improvement and/or ISD efforts.
So I have learned to listen carefully at the Resistors.
And if I feel that perhaps they are right, I find myself tilting at a new Windmill. The new thing to be implemented.
I try to get others to think of the initial Implementation as a Test, a Trial, a Pilot-Test, etc. But sometimes the plans call for one big roll-out – and the client/stakeholders don’t even want to hear about anything else – then yikes, I think.
If you find yourself in that position – it’s often, but not always, best to salute, go forward doing your best, all the while thinking about Plan B.
You should always have a Plan B.
A General Rule might be: If you have a Plan A – you should also have a Plan B.
Especially when tilting at windmills.
# # #