The naming convention of “Training” is coming back, from what I read online sometime last week.
So in my time in the biz, the label on the door has gone from Training to Learning and now back to Training.
But I am not sure that many of the intentions and practices for those who rename/ rebrand themselves will change sufficiently as a result.
Why would they?
And besides that is merely one of many required means to be in place to make it all happen.
Are the ends Learning? No.
After all, it is really “all about performance” ultimately, at the enterprise, process and performer levels.
How effectively AND efficiently we enable that, performance capability, is both our goal, and our measure.
Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Effectively and Efficiently Enabling Performance at All 3 Levels
Or why bother?
# # #