L&D: The PROs and CONs of a Facilitated Group Process for Analysis & Design

If Speed & Quality Are Both Important

Then use a Facilitated Group Process for both Analysis and Design of your Instructional Development efforts.

You’ll even determine early whether or not Instruction will adequately address the Business reason for the effort: train New Hires or Address Performance Problems.

Slide1

And you’ll avoid the gapped Content that comes from working with one SME – or a series of SMEs that are collaborating with each other in your efforts.

Slide2

Master Performers can help you document the Performance Requirements. Who else would know – but those already doing the work to a level of acknowledged Mastery?

Slide3

Master Performers can help you be most accurate.

Slide4

Master Performers can help you be most complete.

Slide5

Master Performers can help you be more appropriate in what gets covered – and what is not necessary.

Slide6

For speed and quality…

Slide7

But there are costs…

Slide8

And with the guidance of your detailed designs – they can also help you better with Development.

Slide9

A Past Post on this:

A Few More Resources

For Free…

CAD – Training Mag – 1984 – 6 page PDF – the first publication about Curriculum Architecture Design via a Group Process – published in Training Magazine in September 1984. Original manuscript (30 pages) – How to Build a Training Structure That Won’t Keep Burning Down.

Models and Matrices- NSPI PIJ -1984 – 5 page PDF – the first publication of the performance and enabler analysis methods for ISD, from NSPI’s (ISPI’s) Performance & Instruction Journal, November 1984.

ISPI Masters Series Article – lean-ISD – PIJ – 2001 – 14 page PDF – written as a companion piece to my 2001 Masters Series presentation at ISPI, this provides the background and an overview of lean applied to ISD – Instructional Systems Design – in the 5 methodology-sets of my PACT Processes for Training, Learning and Knowledge Management. Written in 2000, published in ISPI’s Performance and Improvement Journal in 2001.

Perf Modeling & Enabler Analysis – HR-Com – 2003 – 17 page PDF – an online publication at HR.Com in 2003 covering the analysis of both Performance Competence Requirements and the Enablers – part of my ISD (PACT) and Performance Improvement (EPPI) methods.

Modeling Mastery Performance and Systematically Deriving the Enablers for Performance Improvement – by Guy W. Wallace, CPT – Chapter 11 of the Handbook of Human Performance Technology – 3rd Edition – 2006.  This methodology was first published in this 1984 article in ISPI’s (then NSPI’s) PIJ in November 1984.

Performance-based ISD – ISPI PX 12-part Series – 2007 – 122 page PDF – an update in 12-parts to my 1999 book: lean-ISD – which covers my ISD methods: The PACT Processes for T&D, Learning and Knowledge Management. Published in ISPI’s PerformanceExpress during the 12 months of 2007.

For a Fee…

PACT 6 Pack B

For info on these 6 books and more, please go – here.

# # #

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s