I’ve Been Doing ISD This Way Since 1982
When my clients’ situations allow. They don’t always. Sometimes they just cannot pull their Master Performers off the job for a 3-day session for Analysis, and then a 3-day session for Design, etc.
Note: Those 3 day timeframes are for CAD – Curriculum Architecture Design efforts. Development projects take a lot less time, depending on the scope of the effort.
The purpose is to conduct an analysis of the job using the Voice of the Master Performers to guide downstream Design and Development – using the same or a subset of those same Master Performers.
GIF Presentation
PowerPoint Show Presentation
Best ISD Practice- Benchmark Your Master Performers
Past Posts on The FGP and Facilitation
- L&D: My Facilitation Guidelines From the 1990s Revisited
- Facilitation in the Practice of Project Planning & Management
- Guy W. Wallace’s PACT Facilitation Guidelines: Series Wrap Up & Close
- T&D: Facilitating a Group Process in ISD – Same As It Ever Was
- L&D: Why I Prefer a Facilitated Group Process for Analysis & Design
- L&D: Facilitating a Group Process to Build In the Quality Quickly
- L&D: Overcoming Experts’ Non-Conscious Knowledge Gaps
- L&D: The Facilitated Group Process for Analysis & Design
Published Articles on the FGP Approach
CAD – Training Mag – 1984 – 6 page PDF – the first publication about Curriculum Architecture Design via a Facilitated Group Process – published in Training Magazine in September 1984. Original manuscript (30 pages) – How to Build a Training Structure That Won’t Keep Burning Down.
Models and Matrices- NSPI PIJ -1984 – 5 page PDF – the first publication of the performance and enabler analysis methods for ISD using a Facilitated Group Process, from NSPI’s (ISPI’s) Performance & Instruction Journal, November 1984.
ISPI Masters Series Article – lean-ISD – PIJ – 2001 – 14 page PDF – written as a companion piece to my 2001 Masters Series presentation at ISPI, this provides the background and an overview of lean applied to ISD – Instructional Systems Design – in the 5 methodology-sets of my PACT Processes for Training, Learning and Knowledge Management. Written in 2000, published in ISPI’s Performance and Improvement Journal in 2001.
Perf Modeling & Enabler Analysis – HR-Com – 2003 – 17 page PDF – an online publication at HR.Com in 2003 covering the analysis of both Performance Competence Requirements and the Enablers – part of my ISD (PACT) and Performance Improvement (EPPI) methods.
Modeling Mastery Performance and Systematically Deriving the Enablers for Performance Improvement– by Guy W. Wallace, CPT – Chapter 11 of the Handbook of Human Performance Technology – 3rd Edition – 2006. This methodology was first published in this 1984 article in ISPI’s (then NSPI’s) PIJ in November 1984.
Performance-based ISD – ISPI PX 12-part Series – 2007 – 122 page PDF – an update in 12-parts to my 1999 book: lean-ISD – which covers my ISD methods: The PACT Processes for T&D, Learning and Knowledge Management. Published in ISPI’s PerformanceExpress during the 12 months of 2007.
# # #
