Here are some online resources about this Foo Foo/ Myth…
*** *** *** ***
Just how common is it for Level I results to give management the wrong impression? According to the
research, very.
From: Are You Too Nice to Train? (Aug 06) – by Sarah Boehle
*** *** *** ***
Evaluation: The Link between Learning and Performance – By Roger Chevalier, CPT
In one case, a trainer who was rated in the bottom third of all trainers by his students in Level 1 satisfaction evaluations, was found to be one of the most effective in how his students performed during the first three months after they graduated.
While the students were unhappy about working evenings (as was reflected in their Level 1 evaluations), they were much better prepared for the real world.
Fight the Foo Foo
*** *** *** ***
*** *** *** ***
Please add additional resources – about “evidence” and not just “opinions” – either way – in the comments section below.
# # #
EPPIC - Pursuing Performance 
Pingback: My Top 5 Problems/Opportunities* with the Learning Profession’s Practices | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: L&D: Have You Done an Internal Myth Audit? | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: L&D – Swing for the Fences, or Lay Down a Bunt? | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: This Week’s L&D Buzz… Evidence Based Practices in Learning | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: There Is Too Much Foo Foo in ID and PI Practices | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Foo Foo – in Instructional Design and Performance Improvement | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Persistent Learning & Performance Improvement Myths | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Avoid the Foo Foo in ISD and PI and (Your Profession Here) | EPPIC – Pursuing Performance