There Is Too Much Foo Foo
Here are links to Pages on this site with links to research findings off this site – on each of the various types of Foo Foo found often in Instructional Design and Performance Improvement, including:
- Analysis with Subject Matter Experts
- Blooms Taxonomy
- Brain – Right Brain – Left Brain – and Learning
- Collaboration Myths
- Designing Learning/ Training for Generational Differences Myths
- Designing Learning/ Training for Learning Styles Myths
- Employee Engagement
- Evaluation – Level 1 Evaluations/Smiles Sheets
- NLP – Neuro-Linguistic Programming
- Transfer – Only 10% of Training transfers to the Job
- Wisdom of the Crowd
- 70-20-10
Good general online Sources for your self defense:
Foo Foo Fighting In the Online Trenches:
- Feedback leads to improved performance.
- Immediate feedback is more effective in improving performance than delayed feedback.
- Job satisfaction generally leads to improved performance.
- Successful performance during training usually results in improved post-training performance.
- If you want to learn how to do something, go to the expert.
- Physical capital generates a significantly higher return-on-investment (ROI) than human capital.
- Technology advances since 1970 have consistently accelerated an overall increase in work productivity.
- Common sense is a friendly ally of science.
- Training myths: False beliefs that limit the efficiency and effectiveness of training solutions, part 1
- Training myths: False beliefs that limit training efficiency and effectiveness, part 2
Training Effectiveness
Kirkpatrick Model
Training Expenditures
Training Development Ratios
Growth of Training
Growth of eLearning
10% Transfer of Training Myth
Transfer of Training Rate
20% x 20% x 10% = 0.4% Myth
Training and the Bottom Line
Generational Differences
Downsizing
Knowledge Economy
Class Size
Personalized System of Instruction
Active Learning
Media
Note Taking
Instructor Effectiveness
Informal Learning
Staffing HRD
There Is Too Much Foo Foo
What’s on your list of Foo Foo?
Pingback: More Curious Learning - Learning Rebels
Pingback: Foo Foo – in Instructional Design and Performance Improvement | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: T&D: Do Your Methods Average Performance Up or Down? | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: L&D: Myths to Battle and Miles To Go Before We Sleep* | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: L&D: Quit the Faddish Foo Foo | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: L&D: Do Not Practice Indifferent Acceptance | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: L&D: The Bloom Is Off the Rose – Or the Rose Is Off the Bloom | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: L&D: The Future of the Profession Currently Known as LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT? | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: It’s time for disruptive learning. – Total Edification
Pingback: My View Re: The Reference Model 70:20:10 | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Invalid Learning Practices Waste Limited Resources | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Your Clients Forgive You For Employing Learning Myths! | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Sometimes MashUps Are Misleading: Dale’s Cone and Retention Data | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Still… Many of Us Ask: Why Won’t This Myth Die? | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Foo Foo – in Instructional Design and Performance Improvement | EPPIC - Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Voodoo and Foo Foo in L&D and PI About Learning Styles | EPPIC – Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Learning Myths That Mislead | EPPIC – Pursuing Performance
Pingback: Why Bother Tilting At Windmills – That’s So Quixotic « EPPIC – Pursuing Performance
Pingback: New Grist for an Old Mill – Sometime the Wheat Still Contains the Chaff « EPPIC – Pursuing Performance